Prompting Techniques that you need to learn before creating the AI agents

Before diving into examples, understand this: prompting techniques are the building blocks of effective AI agents. Whether you're building automated workflows, customer service bots, or research assistants, the quality of your agent's performance directly depends on how well you structure its reasoning process.

Why This Matters: The Foundation of Effective AI Agents

Think of it this way:

  • Basic prompts = Simple tools that answer questions
  • Advanced prompting techniques = The cognitive architecture that makes agents reliable, accurate, and trustworthy
  • Well-designed agents = Combinations of these techniques working together systematically

Without mastering these techniques, you're essentially building agents with flawed reasoning patterns. With them, you're creating AI systems that think clearly, act reliably, and deliver consistent value.

The Agent Revolution

AI agents are moving from experimental novelty to business critical infrastructure. Companies are deploying agents for:

  • Customer support automation
  • Data analysis and reporting
  • Code review and generation
  • Market research and competitive intelligence
  • Content creation and editing workflows

The bottleneck isn't the technology—it's prompting expertise. The difference between an agent that saves 2 hours per week and one that saves 20 hours per week is almost always in how it's prompted.

Let's look at how each technique transforms AI from a simple Q&A tool into an intelligent agent.

1. Chain of Thought (CoT)

Without CoT:

Prompt: "Should we launch our product in Q1 or Q2?"

Response: "Q2 would be better."

With CoT:

Prompt: "Should we launch our product in Q1 or Q2? Think through this step by step."

Response: "Let me think through this systematically:

  1. First, consider market conditions: Q1 typically has lower consumer spending post-holidays, while Q2 sees recovery and increased business budgets.

  2. Next, look at competition: Our main competitor launches in March, so Q1 puts us in direct conflict, while Q2 gives us differentiation space.

  3. Then, assess internal readiness: Our development team needs 2 more months for testing, putting us at late February at earliest.

  4. Finally, consider marketing timing: A Q2 launch allows us to build anticipation through Q1 campaigns.

Given these factors, Q2 launch (specifically April) appears optimal—it avoids direct competition, aligns with our development timeline, and capitalizes on stronger market conditions."

2. Few-Shot Prompting

Without Few-Shot:

Prompt: "Analyze this customer feedback: 'The app crashes every time I try to upload photos.'"

Response: "The customer is experiencing a technical issue with photo uploads."

With Few-Shot:

Prompt: "Analyze customer feedback and categorize it with priority and department. Here are examples:

Example 1: Feedback: 'Love the new interface! So much easier to navigate.' Category: Positive | Priority: Low | Department: Product | Sentiment: Satisfied

Example 2: Feedback: 'Cannot process payments. Tried 5 times. Losing sales!' Category: Critical Bug | Priority: High | Department: Engineering | Sentiment: Frustrated

Example 3: Feedback: 'Would be great to have dark mode option.' Category: Feature Request | Priority: Medium | Department: Product | Sentiment: Constructive

Now analyze this: Feedback: 'The app crashes every time I try to upload photos.'"

Response: "Category: Critical Bug | Priority: High | Department: Engineering | Sentiment: Frustrated"

3. Tree of Thought (ToT)

Without ToT:

Prompt: "How should we reduce customer churn?"

Response: "Improve customer service and offer discounts to at-risk customers."

With ToT:

Prompt: "How should we reduce customer churn? Explore multiple strategic approaches, evaluate each path, and recommend the best solution."

Response: "Let me explore several strategic paths:

Path 1: Pricing Strategy

  • Approach: Introduce flexible pricing tiers and loyalty discounts
  • Pros: Immediate impact, addresses price sensitivity
  • Cons: Reduces margins, may not solve root causes
  • Evaluation: Medium effectiveness (60% of churn is non-price related per our data)

Path 2: Product Enhancement

  • Approach: Address top 3 feature gaps vs competitors
  • Pros: Increases product value, creates differentiation
  • Cons: 4-6 month timeline, resource intensive
  • Evaluation: High long-term effectiveness but delayed impact

Path 3: Customer Success Program

  • Approach: Proactive onboarding + quarterly business reviews
  • Pros: Builds relationships, identifies issues early
  • Cons: Requires team expansion, higher touch model
  • Evaluation: High effectiveness (data shows 80% retention with active CSM engagement)

Path 4: Data-Driven Intervention

  • Approach: Predictive model identifies at-risk customers, triggers automated workflows
  • Pros: Scalable, early warning system, can be combined with other paths
  • Cons: Requires ML investment, 2-3 month setup
  • Evaluation: Very high effectiveness when combined with Path 3

Recommended Synthesis: Combine Path 4 (predictive model) + Path 3 (targeted high-touch for at-risk accounts) + selective Path 2 (address top 1 feature gap). This hybrid approach gives immediate action capability while building toward systematic improvement."

4. ReAct Prompting

Without ReAct:

Prompt: "What's the market size for electric vehicles in Europe?"

Response: "Based on my training data from early 2025, the European EV market was valued at approximately €150-200 billion..."

With ReAct:

Prompt: "What's the current market size for electric vehicles in Europe? Search for the latest data and provide an analysis."

Response: "Thought: I need current 2025 data on European EV market size. Let me search for recent market reports.

Action: Searching for "European electric vehicle market size 2025"

Observation: Recent reports indicate the European EV market reached €247 billion in 2024 and is projected to grow 18% in 2025.

Thought: This is helpful but I should verify with another source and get more granular data.

Action: Searching for "Europe EV sales statistics 2025"

Observation: Q1 2025 showed 2.1 million EV units sold across Europe, up 22% year-over-year. Germany, UK, and France represent 58% of sales.

Thought: Now I can provide a comprehensive answer with current data.

Response: The European EV market is currently valued at approximately €247 billion (2024 figures) with projected 18% growth through 2025, potentially reaching €290+ billion. Q1 2025 data shows strong momentum with 2.1 million units sold, representing 22% year-over-year growth. The market is concentrated in three key countries—Germany, UK, and France—which together account for 58% of European sales. This indicates a robust and expanding market with significant geographic concentration."

Cursor PR Review

Key Takeaways

Use CoT when: You need transparent reasoning, are solving complex problems, or want to verify the logic behind recommendations.

Use Few-Shot when: You need consistent formatting, want specific output structures, or are training the AI on your organization's standards.

Use ToT when: You're making strategic decisions, need to evaluate multiple approaches, or want comprehensive analysis of trade-offs.

Use ReAct when: You need current information, must verify facts from multiple sources, or are conducting research that requires iterative investigation.

Pro tip: These techniques can be combined! For example, use Few-Shot to establish your desired format, then add Chain of Thought to ensure thorough reasoning within that format.